To object to wearing jeans and shirt divorced wife

A Mumbai family court said that objection to wearing jeans and Kurta wife and forced to wear a Sari to be cruelty by the husband and it might be the basis for seeking a divorce. The wife said to her husband in December 2010 after marriage and so he bought a shirt and jeans cloth was purchased from his earnings. However, her husband did not allow her to wear. Her husband says that she should wear only saris. Family Court Chief Justice Dr. Lakshmi Rao in its order on June 24, the wife of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, Section 27 (1D) divorced on the grounds of cruelty. "The challenge has not been anything said in the petition so it can be said that the petitioner has proved his case. Therefore must be divorced by her prayers. He says he was prevented from wearing jeans and shirt belongs to cruelty as defined under this Act. " The wife also alleged that her husband and mother - father to Rs 1 lakh from his house or face dire consequences, warned of. She told him to leave his job, but he refused to succumb to them. The wife alleged that he was tortured and humiliated. As a result he suffered from depression and made ​​life unpleasant. She also alleged that her mother - father abused him on some pretext and warned that dire consequences if he did not bring dowry.